Categories: News & Updates

Connecticut’s C&D Enforcement Action Against Kalshi Is Paused by a Federal Court

Connecticut regulators’ enforcement action against prediction market operator Kalshi has been halted by a federal judge. As the company’s legal battles in the United States continue, the respite provides a limited window of safety.

Earlier in December, Kalshi, Robinhood, and Crypto.com received letters from Connecticut’s Department of Consumer Protection (DCP) accusing them of permitting residents of the state to engage in what the DCP called unlicensed online gambling. Offering sports-related contracts through these sites, according to regulators, essentially amounts to sports betting, which needs state approval.

The following day, Kalshi retaliated by filing a lawsuit in federal court. The business maintains that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), not state gaming authorities, has complete jurisdiction over the markets it lists. Kalshi claims that since its contracts are regarded as federally controlled derivatives, the state lacks the authority to independently monitor them.

ALSO READ: Inside the Dark and Predatory World of Crypto Casinos

The crucial question at hand is whether Connecticut’s gambling regulations can be enforced in this situation or if federal commodities law will take precedence. U.S. District Judge Vernon Oliver has directed the DCP to stop enforcing its cease-and-desist order until that issue is settled.

Kalshi’s response is due on January 30, and the state must file its response by January 9, according to the judge’s instructions. The first significant indication of the court’s stance on the conflicting claims of federal preemption vs. state power is anticipated to come from a hearing set for February 12.

Massachusetts makes its own argument against markets connected to sports.

There are other states that are pushing the subject besides Connecticut. Massachusetts filed a separate lawsuit, requesting that a state court prevent Kalshi from allowing locals to exchange contracts based on the results of athletic events. For the first time, a state is requesting a court order that directly targets Kalshi’s sports-related items.

Courtesy: https://www.covers.com, https://www.casino.org, https://pechanga.net

Veer

Recent Posts

Improved Markets: As Expected, “Prediction Markets” Are Nothing More Than Casinos

Kalshi and Polymarket, two large financial firms looking to maximize their profits, have unleashed unregulated…

2 days ago

Maine’s Online Casinos: Implications for State Policy and Tribal Revenue

Gov. Janet Mills approved a bill that permits online gaming, making Maine the eighth state…

1 week ago

The Nevada Gaming Control Board is suing to outlaw polymarketing in the state.

The first state to file a lawsuit against Polymarket is the Nevada Gaming Control Board…

1 week ago

Nevada authorities caution license holders about playing video games online.

Late on Friday, the Nevada Gaming Control Board provided Nevada licensees with further policy guidelines…

1 week ago

Lawmakers in Washington are considering easing restrictions on sports betting.

In an effort to potentially expand one of the most limited legal sports betting markets…

1 week ago

Which States Will Add Online Casinos in 2026?

An important milestone in the growth of gambling in the US has been reached with…

2 weeks ago