Categories: News & Updates

Judge dismisses California Tribes’ lawsuit against cardrooms.

Sacramento Superior Court Judge Lauri A. Damrell ruled Friday morning that the gaming tribes’ case against the state’s cardrooms is precluded by federal law and cannot proceed.

Adam Lauridsen, the tribes’ lawyer, quickly informed the judge that the tribes would appeal, prolonging a torturous and nasty dispute between California’s two largest gambling rivals.

The long-running controversy revolves around banking table games such as blackjack, which usually pit gamblers against the house.

The cardrooms say that the tribes had the opportunity to protest the cardrooms’ actions during their talks with California’s governor over their gaming compacts, as outlined in the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA).

ALSO READ: How gambling shapes lives in Whatcom County through rolling the dice

Benjamin Horwich, the lead lawyer for the cardrooms, informed Damrell on Friday that “there is a process through which things work.”

The judge’s decision came after less than an hour of back and forth between the two lawyers.

Damrell declared, “I am going to adopt my tentative [ruling].” “I might be mistaken. Additionally, I anticipate an appeal. Therefore, I also appreciate the Court of Appeal’s instruction on this, and we’ll see where it goes.

“I believe we do plan to appeal,” Lauridsen replied right away, asking that all evidence that had been kept in accordance with the judge’s directions be kept intact throughout any appeal.

On November 4, Damrell planned a “status conference” to talk further about the issue.

If not, it is assumed that the appeal will now be heard by the Third District Court of Appeal, which normally considers appeals from the Sacramento County Superior Court, but this is a special instance. Before the tribes’ position on this matter is once more taken into consideration in court, it will probably be months.

A legislative remedy

After the California Legislature passed SB 549 last year, the tribes, which as sovereign nations lack the legal standing to file a lawsuit in state court, were granted the ability to do so.

Due to a lack of standing, tribes’ previous attempts to sue cardrooms over banked games were rejected by judges who held that, as sovereign nations, the tribes lacked the legal capacity to file a lawsuit.

Courtesy: https://www.covers.com, https://www.casino.org, https://pechanga.net

Veer

Recent Posts

Improved Markets: As Expected, “Prediction Markets” Are Nothing More Than Casinos

Kalshi and Polymarket, two large financial firms looking to maximize their profits, have unleashed unregulated…

2 days ago

Maine’s Online Casinos: Implications for State Policy and Tribal Revenue

Gov. Janet Mills approved a bill that permits online gaming, making Maine the eighth state…

1 week ago

The Nevada Gaming Control Board is suing to outlaw polymarketing in the state.

The first state to file a lawsuit against Polymarket is the Nevada Gaming Control Board…

1 week ago

Nevada authorities caution license holders about playing video games online.

Late on Friday, the Nevada Gaming Control Board provided Nevada licensees with further policy guidelines…

1 week ago

Lawmakers in Washington are considering easing restrictions on sports betting.

In an effort to potentially expand one of the most limited legal sports betting markets…

1 week ago

Which States Will Add Online Casinos in 2026?

An important milestone in the growth of gambling in the US has been reached with…

2 weeks ago