Categories: News & Updates

Judge dismisses California Tribes’ lawsuit against cardrooms.

Sacramento Superior Court Judge Lauri A. Damrell ruled Friday morning that the gaming tribes’ case against the state’s cardrooms is precluded by federal law and cannot proceed.

Adam Lauridsen, the tribes’ lawyer, quickly informed the judge that the tribes would appeal, prolonging a torturous and nasty dispute between California’s two largest gambling rivals.

The long-running controversy revolves around banking table games such as blackjack, which usually pit gamblers against the house.

The cardrooms say that the tribes had the opportunity to protest the cardrooms’ actions during their talks with California’s governor over their gaming compacts, as outlined in the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA).

ALSO READ: How gambling shapes lives in Whatcom County through rolling the dice

Benjamin Horwich, the lead lawyer for the cardrooms, informed Damrell on Friday that “there is a process through which things work.”

The judge’s decision came after less than an hour of back and forth between the two lawyers.

Damrell declared, “I am going to adopt my tentative [ruling].” “I might be mistaken. Additionally, I anticipate an appeal. Therefore, I also appreciate the Court of Appeal’s instruction on this, and we’ll see where it goes.

“I believe we do plan to appeal,” Lauridsen replied right away, asking that all evidence that had been kept in accordance with the judge’s directions be kept intact throughout any appeal.

On November 4, Damrell planned a “status conference” to talk further about the issue.

If not, it is assumed that the appeal will now be heard by the Third District Court of Appeal, which normally considers appeals from the Sacramento County Superior Court, but this is a special instance. Before the tribes’ position on this matter is once more taken into consideration in court, it will probably be months.

A legislative remedy

After the California Legislature passed SB 549 last year, the tribes, which as sovereign nations lack the legal standing to file a lawsuit in state court, were granted the ability to do so.

Due to a lack of standing, tribes’ previous attempts to sue cardrooms over banked games were rejected by judges who held that, as sovereign nations, the tribes lacked the legal capacity to file a lawsuit.

Courtesy: https://www.covers.com, https://www.casino.org, https://pechanga.net

Veer

Recent Posts

At G2E, gambling loss deductions and slot thresholds were heavily utilized.

Leaders of the gaming industry met last week at Global Gaming Expo in Las Vegas…

1 day ago

During the Mariners’ postseason run, Tribal Resort Casino witnesses a surge in sports betting.

The Seattle Mariners' playoff run has increased traffic at the Tulalip Resort and Casino's sportsbook.…

1 day ago

The mayor of Chicago suggests a city tax on the profits from sports betting.

In his 2026 budget, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson is proposing a 10.25% tax on adjusted…

1 day ago

Report: This year, FanDuel Partner CME may offer contracts on sporting events.

According to a source, FanDuel's prediction market partner CME may soon provide contracts for sporting…

1 day ago

Nevada Gaming Control Board warns licensees against prediction market involvement.

The Nevada Gaming Control Board (NGCB), with the subject line "Sports Event Contracts Are Wagers,"…

2 days ago

Nevada judge explains change of heart on sports contract legality.

Despite having previously given Kalshi a similar concession, Nevada District Court Judge Andrew Gordon has…

2 days ago