Categories: News & Updates

Kalshi takes the Connecticut regulator to court over a cease and desist letter.

Add Connecticut to the increasing list of states involved in a legal battle with Kalshi.

The Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection’s (DCP) Gaming Division, which regulates gaming in the state, issued cease and desist letters to Robinhood, Kalshi, and Crypto.com on December 2, informing all three that the government group believes the sports-related event contracts they offer violate state gaming law.

In a news statement regarding the cease and desist letters, DCP Commissioner Bryan T. Cafferelli stated that “only licensed entities may offer sports wagering in the state of Connecticut.” “None of these organizations are licensed to provide gambling in our state, and even if they were, their contracts would be in violation of a number of other state laws and regulations, such as providing gambling to people younger than 21.”

The day following the C&D letter, Kalshi filed the lawsuit.

ALSO READ: Hochul’s desk receives the New York Sweepstakes Gaming Ban Bill.

In response, Kalshi sued the regulator in Connecticut District Court, requesting an injunction that would prevent the cease and desist from being enforced the next day. Crypto.com and Robinhood have not yet brought a comparable lawsuit.

Kalshi’s action contends, as it has in numerous other states, that the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) preempts state gaming laws and that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is solely responsible for regulating all even contracts.

It also presented an argument in its court battle with the Massachusetts Gaming Commission (MGC) that what the regulator is requesting would take down every contract provided on Kalshi’s website.

Kalshi claims. Connecticut is interested with more than sports.

The complaint refers to the cease and desist letter’s content, specifically how Connecticut regulators define “gambling”.

Since Connecticut law “prohibits gambling,” which is defined as “risking any money, credit, deposit or other thing of value for gain contingent in whole or in part upon lot, chance, or the operation of a gambling device,” and Kalshi’s actions do not “fall within any of the excepted activities to the prohibition on gambling,” DCP’s cease-and-desist letter suggested that all of Kalshi’s event contracts are illegal.

But it appears that the DCP letter is limited to sports contracts.

The letter states, “The Department of Consumer Protection (the “Department”) has learned that KalshiEX LLC, d/b/a Kalshi (“Kalshi”), is engaging in unlicensed online gambling, specifically sports wagering, in Connecticut through its online sports event contracts.”

Courtesy: https://www.covers.com, https://www.casino.org, https://pechanga.net

Veer

Recent Posts

Powerball extends over to $65 million.

Since no one matched all six numbers on Saturday night, the Powerball prize has increased…

2 days ago

Improved Markets: As Expected, “Prediction Markets” Are Nothing More Than Casinos

Kalshi and Polymarket, two large financial firms looking to maximize their profits, have unleashed unregulated…

1 week ago

Maine’s Online Casinos: Implications for State Policy and Tribal Revenue

Gov. Janet Mills approved a bill that permits online gaming, making Maine the eighth state…

2 weeks ago

The Nevada Gaming Control Board is suing to outlaw polymarketing in the state.

The first state to file a lawsuit against Polymarket is the Nevada Gaming Control Board…

2 weeks ago

Nevada authorities caution license holders about playing video games online.

Late on Friday, the Nevada Gaming Control Board provided Nevada licensees with further policy guidelines…

2 weeks ago

Lawmakers in Washington are considering easing restrictions on sports betting.

In an effort to potentially expand one of the most limited legal sports betting markets…

2 weeks ago