Categories: News & Updates

Massachusetts responds after Robinhood requests an injunction.

The state of Massachusetts has filed a formal brief opposing Robinhood’s motion for a preliminary injunction. It’s the latest salvo in the growing legal dispute over prediction markets and sports-related event contracts.

Robinhood had asked a judge to block Massachusetts regulators from enforcing state laws that it argues are preempted by federal statutes. The company claims its event-based offerings, which allow users to trade on sports outcomes, fall under federal commodities law rather than state gambling regulations.

Massachusetts rejected that argument, stating that Robinhood’s assertion of nationwide legalization of sports betting is unfounded.

According to the suit, Robinhood’s justification was “smoke and mirrors,” citing federal court decisions that uphold state jurisdiction over gaming regulation.

ALSO READ: New Casinos in the U.S. vs EU: Key Considerations

Additionally, the state cited a related case in which Crypto.com was barred from placing sports wagers in Nevada. Although Robinhood had claimed that such regulations have been repealed after 2010, the brief also cited earlier rulings that held that states have the authority to unilaterally regulate what constitutes permissible gaming.

In Ohio, Kalshi files a lawsuit.

There has been a confrontation with Kalshi in Ohio, which is comparable to the litigation against Robinhood in Massachusetts. The company has filed lawsuits against the state attorney general and the Ohio Casino Control Commission, claiming that the state abused its power by shutting down its operations and threatening its competitors.

The case, which was filed on October 7, claims that the business was affected by the allegedly unlawful enforcement.

Kalshi contends that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), not state gaming authorities, is in charge of its event-based markets, which include those connected to sporting events. The business argues that Ohio’s warnings to licensed sportsbooks and cease-and-desist letter essentially prevented it from reaching users and partners.

Courtesy: https://www.covers.com, https://www.casino.org, https://pechanga.net

Veer

Recent Posts

Improved Markets: As Expected, “Prediction Markets” Are Nothing More Than Casinos

Kalshi and Polymarket, two large financial firms looking to maximize their profits, have unleashed unregulated…

2 days ago

Maine’s Online Casinos: Implications for State Policy and Tribal Revenue

Gov. Janet Mills approved a bill that permits online gaming, making Maine the eighth state…

1 week ago

The Nevada Gaming Control Board is suing to outlaw polymarketing in the state.

The first state to file a lawsuit against Polymarket is the Nevada Gaming Control Board…

1 week ago

Nevada authorities caution license holders about playing video games online.

Late on Friday, the Nevada Gaming Control Board provided Nevada licensees with further policy guidelines…

1 week ago

Lawmakers in Washington are considering easing restrictions on sports betting.

In an effort to potentially expand one of the most limited legal sports betting markets…

1 week ago

Which States Will Add Online Casinos in 2026?

An important milestone in the growth of gambling in the US has been reached with…

2 weeks ago