Categories: News & Updates

Motions regarding the proposed Vallejo casino are filed by Scotts Valley.

The Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians filed motions on Friday morning in three federal cases seeking dismissal of lawsuits brought by its rival casino tribes, just one day after learning that its initial gaming rights for a planned Vallejo casino project may have been based on “a legal error.”

24 single-family homes, a tribal administration building, a parking garage, and a 45-acre biological preserve area situated inside and next to the city boundary in Solano County, close to the intersection of Interstate 80 and Highway 37, are all part of the proposed 160-acre Vallejo casino. At a cost of $700 million, the casino would be open seven days a week, twenty-four hours a day.

ALSO READ: Gambling reached all-time highs due to sports betting. Arizona joins the anti-underage play campaign

However, after Judge Trevor McFadden of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia rejected Scotts Valley’s efforts to invalidate the reconsideration process in October, and after the Department of the Interior acknowledged on Wednesday that its initial approval of Scotts Valley’s proposed casino may have been based on “legal error,” the tribe filed the following motions to intervene and dismiss:

The motions are before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and they seek to dismiss lawsuits filed by opposing casino tribes attempting to overturn the Department of the Interior’s Jan. 10 decision to place 160 acres of land in Vallejo in trust for Scotts Valley and confirm the Tribe’s eligibility to conduct gaming on that land under the federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.

Scotts Valley said on Friday that it had moved to intervene in each case, with the sole intention of seeking dismissal under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. According to the Tribe’s viewpoint, because the cases directly threaten Scotts Valley’s trust land and eligibility for restored lands, federal law necessitates the Tribe’s participation as a party; nevertheless, tribal sovereign immunity protects the Tribe from being unwillingly joined. According to binding Supreme Court precedent, the cases must be dismissed.

Courtesy: https://www.covers.com, https://www.casino.org, https://pechanga.net

Veer

Recent Posts

DraftKings Offers CME Contracts and Introduces a Prediction Market in 38 States

Through a partnership with CME, DraftKings launched its own prediction market on Friday morning. It…

1 day ago

World Cup 2026 Betting: USA Favored to Win Group

As WORLD CUP 2026 BETTING markets open well in advance of kickoff, the worldwide sports…

2 days ago

Where is Online Casino Legal? Legal States Tracker

Learning WHERE IS ONLINE GAMBLING LEGAL in the United States has also gained more significance…

2 days ago

The Best Real Money Online Casinos for US Players in 2025

The online gambling business in the United States has been growing at a very fast…

2 days ago

BitStarz Real Money Online Casino Introduces New Online Slots in the USA in 2025

The online casino market in the US is in an exciting stage in 2025, and…

3 days ago

Poll reveals Americans’ growing concern about the influence of sports gambling.

According to a Washington Post-University of Maryland survey, Americans are getting more concerned about the…

4 days ago